查看完整版本: 白腰杓鷸

cpingkuen 5/03/2009 23:40

白腰杓鷸

濕地公園
28/02/2009
[img]http://images5.fotop.net/albums5/billman/The_6th_CBC_Lesson/DSC_0136.jpg[/img]
[img]http://images5.fotop.net/albums5/billman/The_6th_CBC_Lesson/DSC_0139.jpg[/img]
[img]http://images5.fotop.net/albums5/billman/The_6th_CBC_Lesson/DSC_0154.jpg[/img]

Beetle 7/03/2009 00:46

Try not to use iso1600 on D50. The photo quality is not really good. Iso 400 is already enough - according to the EXIF info.
盡量不要用D50的iso1600, 質素不是太好。根據exif現場光應該400就足夠了。

msamuel 7/03/2009 10:52

Was it due to post-shot editting too much? 3551a50445

Beetle 7/03/2009 15:36

[quote]Original posted by [i]msamuel[/i] at 7/03/2009 10:52 [url=http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=18251&ptid=7566][img]http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Was it due to post-shot editting too much? 3551a50445 [/quote]
probably not, but the sharpness was set to high level on the camera, which may cause some reduction in quality; High level of Compression is also a reason; But the main reason was the iso1600 on D50. I have the same camera so i know its noise-control perfomance is not good on higher ISO.
應該不是,不過機身sharpness調得高,可能對質素有些少影響; 另外從檔案大小看得出相片壓縮程度大; 不過主要原因還是D50的iso 1600...我有同一部機所以知道它在高iso時控制noise的能力不高。

[[i] Last edited by Beetle at 7/03/2009 15:41 [/i]]
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 白腰杓鷸