Thread
Print

Richard's Pipit or Upland Pipit ?

Richard's Pipit or Upland Pipit ?

Tai Mo Shan, 16 June 2007

Attachment

_DSC0063.jpg (0 Bytes)

21/06/2007 00:30

_DSC0063.jpg

_DSC0051.jpg (0 Bytes)

21/06/2007 00:30

_DSC0051.jpg

_DSC0014.jpg (0 Bytes)

21/06/2007 00:30

_DSC0014.jpg

TOP

Based on structure (long legs, relatively slender bill) and some aspects of plumage (heavily marked upperparts, obvious malar), these are juvenile Richard's Pipits - see my comments on the other recent thread concerning these two species. The heavily 'scalloped' upperparts indicate that they are juvenile birds.

I actually find that Upland Pipit can be a very difficult bird to see, especially to see well. It is more skulking than most pipits, disappearing into the mountain grassland, and only really seems to show well when singing from rocks.

TOP

These pix are of Upland Pipit.

The spots on the back are heavy, and the bill is short and deep. It also shows a thick neck.

I thnk the bill looks longer in these pix because this is a recently fledged bird, which still has the baby skin around the edge of the bill.

Cheers

Mike K
Mike KilburnVice Chairman, HKBWSChairman, Conservation Committee

TOP

It looks like a juvenile Richard's to me. As John says, structure first this species. The malar patches are very obvious, which is not a feature of Upland.

Geoff

TOP

Thread