Y/YL-MP/1 米埔及錦花園
把「康樂」、「自然保育區」地帶改劃為「其他指定用途」註明「綜合發展及濕地保護區」地帶
摘要及位置圖
http://www.info.gov.hk/tpb/tc/plan_application/Y_YL-MP_1.html
就申請提出意見的屆滿日期: 26/09/2008
這是一個面積約4公頃的住宅發展 (包括3公頃的補償濕地及1公頃的住宅 - 38間三層高的房子)
問題
1. 「康樂」、「自然保育區」地帶 位於 「濕地保育區」內。若申請成功，會不會位下不良先例?
2.發展商表示近76%的土地「將會持有 (will be owned)」，而餘下的土地正在洽購中(being acquired)。這是否代表發展商並沒有持有地盤土地？
3. 補償濕地
文件中並沒有詳細提及將來補償濕地的擁有及管理權。也沒有詳細提及將來運作補償濕地的資金來源？
4. 緩衝區
住宅區與補償濕地直接建在一起，沒有緩衝區。日後的人為滋擾可能相當嚴重。
Mai Po & Fairview Park (very close to Palm Spring)
Y/YL-MP/1
To rezone the application site from "Recreation", "Conservation Area" to "Other Specified Uses" annotated "Comprehensive Development and Wetland Protection Area"
Gist and location plan
http://www.info.gov.hk/tpb/tc/plan_application/Y_YL-MP_1.html
Expiry Date for Making Comments on Application: 26/09/2008
It is about a 4 ha residential developments (38 x 3-storey houses with about 3 ha compensated wetlands)
Questions:
1. "Recreation + Conservation Area" are under "Wetland Conservation Area". The proposed rezoning (and the residential development) in "Wetland Conservation Area" = undersirable precendent?
2. landownership
The developer said about 76% of lands "will be owned" and the rest is "being acquired". So, does the developer own the land?
3. Ownership of the future compensated wetlands
Who will own and manage the compensated wetlands? Who will provide funding for the compensated wetlands?
4. Buffer area
There is no buffer area between the residential development and the compensated wetlands
