HKBWS Chuan

Link to the EIA report: http://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/regist ... a_1932011/index.htm
Deadline for submitting comments: 18 March 2011

The Proposed Shek Kwu Chau Incinerator would have an significant impact on the breeding White-bellied Sea Eagle pair. There is little mitigation towards the species and no compensation was suggested in the report. We will submit our official comment later.


環評報告連結: http://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/regist ... a_1932011/index.htm
提出意見的最後日期: 2011年3月18日

擬建的石鼓洲焚化設施會嚴重影響繁殖的白腹海鵰，環評報告並未有就此提出補償措施。我們稍後將就整份環評報告提交正式意見。

HKBWS Chuan

Article on Breeding Ecology of White-bellied Sea Eagle on AFCD newsletter no. 5 & 18:
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/c ... hkbonewsletter5.pdf
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/p ... files/IssueNo18.pdf

漁護署有關白腹海鵰繁殖的文章(英文正文,附中文摘要)：
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/c ... hkbonewsletter5.pdf
http://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/p ... files/IssueNo18.pdf

HKBWS Chuan

The HKBWS OBJECT to the approval of the Shek Kwu Chau option in the EIA report

以下是本會的正式意見: Official Submmision:
HKBWS_comment_EIA-193_2011.pdf (146.93 KB)

HKBWS_comment_EIA-193_2011.pdf (146.93 KB)
Downloaded count: 1037

18/03/2011 21:40

中文摘要:

本會反對通過環評報告石鼓洲選址，主要原因如下：

1. 環評報告指出石鼓洲的生態價值遠比曾咀高， 而且石鼓洲方案提出就生態影響的補償成效成疑; 根據環境影響評估程序的技術備忘錄3.1條，由於石鼓洲方案會破壞高生態價值的環境，亦未能證明補償方案有效，加上至少有一個可行替代方案(曾咀方案)，因此石鼓洲選址並不符合環境影響評估條例要求。

2. 報告指出即使實行了所有緩解措施，白腹海鵰仍有機會棄巢。根據環境影響評估程序的技術備忘錄5.4.5條，如果工程導致有剩餘影響（如白腹海鵰棄巢），需於工程地區以外進行補償措施。本會認為應進行涵蓋全港的白腹海鵰保育方案，才能補償工程帶來對白腹海鵰繁殖成功率的影響。報告未能工程範圍內的緩解措施有效，亦沒有提及任何工程地區外的補償措施，並不符合環境影響評估程序技術備忘錄要求，本會因此反對通過有關方案。

HKBWS Chuan

環境諮詢委員會環境影響評估小組已於3月21日討論該環評報告, 環境諮詢委員會大會將於下星期一的會議(4月11日)討論。本會已經分別致函委員會表達反對意見。
The EIA sub-committee of the Advisory Council on the Environment (ACE) has discussed the EIA report on 21 March 2011, and the "Big Meeting" of ACE would be held next monday (11 April). The HKBWS has sent separate letters to the committee members addressing our objection and comments.


鄭諾銘
香港觀鳥會自然保育主任
Beetle Cheng
Conservation Officer, HKBWS

HKBWS Chuan

焚化爐環評 環諮會通過
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/110411/4/nr1r.html

HKBWS Chuan

石鼓洲焚化爐撤環評

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/110512/3/oa3i.html

HKBWS Chuan

請大家幫忙提交意見往城規會, 反對劃定「其他指定用途」註明「綜合廢物管理設施」地帶。
本會已提交反對意見, 理據為:
1. 該劃定對在石鼓洲繁殖的白腹海鵰造成影響;
2. 石鼓洲的環境影響評估報告未得到批准, 城規會不應接納該劃定。

請往以下連結提交意見, 或電郵往城規會(tpbpd@pland.gov.hk), 截止日期為2011年8月5日:
http://www.info.gov.hk/tpb/tc/plan_making/draft_plan.html
(找尋"石鼓洲"->提交意見)



Please help object to the Shek Kwu Chau Incinerator by submitting comments to Town Planning Board.
HKBWS has already submitted objection to the designation of the IWMF based on the following reasons:
1. The designation would affect the breeding White-bellied Sea Eagle pair on Shek Kwu Chau;
2. The Town Planning Board should not accept such designation because the EIA report has not been approved.

Please use the following link or e-mail (tpbpd@pland.gov.hk) to submit your comments to Town Planning Board, deadline on 5 Aug 2011:
http://www.info.gov.hk/tpb/en/plan_making/draft_plan.html
(Look for Shek Kwu Chau and click "Make Comments")

HKBWS Chuan

環保署重新開始環評報告公眾諮詢，提交意見截止日期為2011年12月17日(星期六)。
本會仍然認為報告未詳細研究對白腹海鵰的影響, 亦因此未為白腹海鵰提出足夠緩解/補償措施。本會的正式意見會於稍後上載討論區。

EPD has restarted the public consultation of the EIA report. the Deadline for submitting comments is 17 Dec 2011 (Sat).
HKBWS still thinks that the report has not yet comprehensively studied the impact on White-bellied Sea Eagle, and thus not suggested adequate mitigation/compensation measures for the Eagle. Our official submission will be uploaded to this forum soon.

HKBWS Chuan

本會對焚化爐環評報告的正式意見 (已於早前提交環保署):
HKBWS's official submission to the EPD on the Incinerator EIA report:
HKBWS_comment_IWMF_EIA-201_2011forum.pdf (299.38 KB)

HKBWS_comment_IWMF_EIA-201_2011forum.pdf (299.38 KB)
Downloaded count: 1075

28/12/2011 12:59