Thanks for the response, Mike, tho I've no idea what "channelling" my expertise might involve; and why not "channelled" already.
When I first became interested in issue, 2003/2004, and realised wild birds wrongly blamed, I came up with info, map etc; including info from others.
As I recall, HKBWS showed no interest in this - certainly did no channelling that I can remember - and was pretty mute on issue.
Interesting snippet here I think:
Quote:
Hong Kong Bird Watching Society chairman Cheung Ho-fai said migratory birds from Panyu are likely to carry the virus to the territory, although previous H5N1 cases in Hong Kong had been found to be unrelated to migratory birds.
http://www.thestandard.com.hk/ne ... 12&sid=15407483
Looking thro this forum section, not really so many threads and posts as perhaps would be expected for an issue of such concern, especially given HK was at epicentre of blaming wild birds for spreading H5N1.
Here, by contrast, is a thread on a website I run: all info was available for "channelling" - and for consideration by Ho-fai, for instance.
http://www.drmartinwilliams.com/ ... and-migratory-birds
I've also posted on this forum; had meagre responses. [Far more responses and interaction with conservationists and others outside HK.]
Bird flu issue seems mostly over now, and more acceptance re Dead Ducks Don't Fly, so it's woefully late to suggest soc would welcome any channelling of my expertise here.
Martin