Subject: Can we move forward? [Print This Page] Author: EricB Time: 21/05/2011 16:05 Subject: Can we move forward?
British Birds and BirdGuides have recently published : Bird photography - a new code of practice. It would seem to be an opportune moment for the HKBWS to reflect on how it should move forward with this thorny issue and agree to publish their new guidelines (and adhere to them in this forum!)
The bottom line was websites do encourage the disturbance of scarce breeding birds by hosting an outlet for certain photos.
Each week BirdGuides approve some 1200 photographs on their site. They reject plenty of them. Here is an outline of their new guidelines
• A well-used mantra but one that is paramount is that the welfare of the bird is more important than the photograph.
• Birds should not be harassed by continual pushing and flushing. Most rarities soon settle into a pattern and successful photography can often be achieved by waiting patiently and allowing the bird to come to you.
• The use of playback vocalisations should be employed sparingly, if at all; if a reaction is not forthcoming immediately, then playback is unlikely to work and should not be repeated in a given territory. It should be noted that the use of playback for species protected under Schedule 1 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act may be considered illegal.
• Photographing breeding species listed under Schedule 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act requires a licence. It is an offence to recklessly disturb a Schedule 1 species when that species is nest-building, at, near or in a nest containing eggs or young. This includes the photography of dependent young.
• Photography at or near a nest should be undertaken only by those with a good understanding of the species involved and who are, therefore, able to keep disturbance to a minimum.
• Vegetation, whether around a nest or in other circumstances, for example concealing a shrike’s larder, should not be chopped away.
• Live bait should never be used to bait predatory birds such as raptors and owls.
• Nesting colonies, roosts and important feeding areas should not be disturbed in pursuit of photographs. The thoughtless actions of one photographer can jeopardise the reputation of others.
• Respect the rights of fellow photographers. If a photographer is in a position close to a bird, resist the urge to immediately join him or her without first gaining their acceptance.
• If digital manipulation is used, then this should be stated to avoid misleading the viewer and misrepresenting the subject.
BirdGuides have gone 1 step further by stating “Therefore, in the interests of the welfare of scarce breeding birds (and consistency), we have decided to take a rather more draconian approach to our photo approvals. From now on, all photos of Schedule 1 species taken between March and June will be rejected by an automated system. We have carefully considered the Schedule 1 list, and we have made three additions of our own (Black Grouse, Long-eared Owl and Nightjar), of birds that may be particularly liable to disturbance during the breeding season.
We hope that you will all agree that this is a fair and positive way forward. It puts the interests of our resident and migrant breeding birds first.”
Thank you for bringing up this subject on this website, Eric.
It is, of course, of great importance that everyone (not just photographers, but birdwatchers as well) consider the welfare of birds and acts accordingly. I would be very much in favour of a similar set of guidelines on this website.
I actually think that most serious bird photographers in Hong Kong are aware of the risks of disturbance to birds and act in such a way as to minimise their potential impacts. This is apparent from the discussions/debates that there have been previously about use of flash and supplementary feeding of birds. Similarly, photographers have in the past been instrumental in campaigns to reduce disturbance to breeding tern colonies. I believe that the majority of serious bird photographers would not act irresponsibly, and would not post pictures which were taken inappropriately.
My main concern is that some of the less experienced photographers may not recognise that they are causing disturbance. I am aware of how difficult it can be to judge whether you are causing disturbance, and even after 30 years of experience there are some occasions when I regret my actions as causing more disturbance than I would like. Camera equipment is easy to get hold of in Hong Kong and I think many of the people taking photographs of birds have only recently taken up the activity, and may not know how to read bird behaviour to look for disturbance. Many of the less experienced photographers may not read or post regularly on this forum. I would, therefore, like to see similar guidelines set up for other photographic forums in Hong Kong (perhaps someone who is a member could suggest this on the other forums).
As long-time visitors to this website may be aware, one of my particular concerns is photography close to nests. At this crucial stage in the life cycle, I believe that nesting birds can very easily be disturbed without someone realising the potential impacts of their actions (again, this does not apply only to photography).
I would like to see a complete ban on photographs of nesting birds on this forum (and preferably also other photography forums). This would discourage those less experienced from accidentally causing disturbance while attempting to take photographs. I realise that there are some situations where actions are less likely to disturb nesting birds (e.g. nesting stilts at Mai Po) but I think that the rule is more easily enforcible with a complete ban, rather than specifying species and sites. Author: ajohn Time: 3/06/2011 17:44
I am actually rather surprised by the lack of comment on this post. I was expecting some feedback from the more active photographers about the various recommendations in this code of practice.
Welcome to HKBWS Forum 香港觀鳥會討論區 (http://hkbws.org.hk/BBS/)
Image Attachment: Glossy.jpg (21/05/2011 16:05, 93.87 KB) / Download count 651