Board logo

Subject: Richard's Pipit or Upland Pipit ? [Print This Page]

Author: kchonhong    Time: 21/06/2007 00:30     Subject: Richard's Pipit or Upland Pipit ?

Tai Mo Shan, 16 June 2007

Image Attachment: _DSC0063.jpg (21/06/2007 00:30, 0 Bytes) / Download count 2140
http://hkbws.org.hk/BBS/attachment.php?aid=1039



Image Attachment: _DSC0051.jpg (21/06/2007 00:30, 0 Bytes) / Download count 2129
http://hkbws.org.hk/BBS/attachment.php?aid=1040



Image Attachment: _DSC0014.jpg (21/06/2007 00:30, 0 Bytes) / Download count 2100
http://hkbws.org.hk/BBS/attachment.php?aid=1041


Author: ajohn    Time: 21/06/2007 09:56

Based on structure (long legs, relatively slender bill) and some aspects of plumage (heavily marked upperparts, obvious malar), these are juvenile Richard's Pipits - see my comments on the other recent thread concerning these two species. The heavily 'scalloped' upperparts indicate that they are juvenile birds.

I actually find that Upland Pipit can be a very difficult bird to see, especially to see well. It is more skulking than most pipits, disappearing into the mountain grassland, and only really seems to show well when singing from rocks.
Author: kmike    Time: 21/06/2007 14:30

These pix are of Upland Pipit.

The spots on the back are heavy, and the bill is short and deep. It also shows a thick neck.

I thnk the bill looks longer in these pix because this is a recently fledged bird, which still has the baby skin around the edge of the bill.

Cheers

Mike K
Author: cgeoff    Time: 27/06/2007 14:00

It looks like a juvenile Richard's to me. As John says, structure first this species. The malar patches are very obvious, which is not a feature of Upland.

Geoff




Welcome to HKBWS Forum 香港觀鳥會討論區 (http://hkbws.org.hk/BBS/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0