Board logo

Subject: [Hong Kong] Views collection on Lok Ma Chau Loop 落馬洲河套區發展意見收集 [Print This Page]

Author: cchristina    Time: 17/06/2008 10:00     Subject: Views collection on Lok Ma Chau Loop 落馬洲河套區發展意見收集

Public engangement exercise to collect community views on possible future land uses for the Lok Ma Chau Loop
落馬洲河套區未來土地用途公眾意見收集

The proposed development plan will affect the land uses of Long Valley. Please send your opinion by visiting the following link.
建議之發展方案將會涉及塱原一帶的地方,請到以下網址發表你的意見。
http://www.dudleysurveyors.com/LMC/
Author: jemi    Time: 27/06/2008 11:47

登記參與論壇

日期 :2008年6月28日(星期六)
時間 :上午9:00 – 下午1:00 (由上午8:30開始登記)
地點 :香港北角百福道21號
香港青年協會大廈9樓演講廳
[鰂魚涌港鐵站C出口轉右;臨時上落車位設於百福道21號]
登記 :報名表格可從公眾意見收集網頁下載及透過電郵info_lmc@dudleysurveyors.com或傳真 2877 0378 遞交表格

Registration for Forum

Date :28 June 2008 (Saturday)
Time :9:00am - 1:00pm (Registration will start at 8:30am)
Venue :HKFYG Auditorium 9/F The Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups Building
21 Pak Fuk Road
North Point Hong Kong
[Quarry Bay MTR Station Exit C; Drop-off Area available at 21 Pak Fuk Road]
Registration :Registration Form may be downloaded here. Please submit your registration form through e-mail info_lmc@dudleysurveyors.com or by fax 2877 0378

[ Last edited by wjemi at 27/06/2008 11:48 ]
Author: jemi    Time: 6/07/2008 19:02

按理工大學共政策研究所 李鍔教授在公眾論壇結束前 總結公眾人士所發表有關落馬洲河套地區未來土地用途之意見。 有五大類:

1)有意見認為主辦機構向公眾提供資料不足,沒法作更深入或有意義討論。例如,利益持分者分佈意見如何 ?

2)有各新界村代表認為政府專注討論發展落馬洲河套地區,政府有沒有顧及周邊及新界其他地區的發展,低密度和丁屋的發展,各方的配套,交通物流等各種各樣的發展呢?

3)有團體及保育人士提出反對發展落馬洲河套地區的建議。另有團體意見認為若需要發展落馬洲河套地區,必須以不影響 周邊高生態價值魚塘 和下游米埔內后海灣《拉姆薩爾公約》國際重要濕地 運作為原則。河套地區位於生態走廊中間,高密度發展河套地區會使現有的生態走廊一分為二,或形成樽頸地帶,阻礙鳥類通過。

4)有許多的意見發表港深兩地發展,如何利用兩地的優勢,尤其是利用香港方面完善法制去配深圳一起發展是最好的方法。同時要顧香港居民得益,使雙方面都獲得好處下去發展特區裏的特區。

5)其他意見,包括各方面利益:
金融、高科技、旅遊、物流、有機耕種、漂染、加工工業等等均可利用落馬洲這個特別的特區發展,增加香港就業機會。

您的意見
請於2008年7月12日或之前提交您的書面意見
http://www.dudleysurveyors.com/LMC/


According to the concluding remarks by Prof. LEE Ngok, Coordinator, Public Policy Research Institute of The H K Polytechnic University.  There were five categories of opinions from the Public Forum.

1) Someone pointed out that there was insufficient information to generate meaningful discussion about the "Future Land Uses for the Lok Ma Chau Loop".  For example: The land owners opinions was not known.

2) NT Villagers queried why the Government was concentrating on the Lok Ma Chau Loop.  Had the Government considered the area nearby the loop and other lands developments in new territories, village houses and low density development, transportation, logistic, facilities etc.

3) There were groups including conservationists made suggestions  against the development in the Lok Ma Chau Loop.  
Some groups made suggestions that any development to the area should prioritise on conserving the ecological corridor in around the Lok Ma Chau Loop and the internationally important Ramsar Mai Po Deep Bay Wetland located down stream.  The loop is located at the middle of the Ecological corridor, any high density development would break the corridor into two or create a bottle neck channel of the birds and other wildlife.

4) There were opinions on co-development on HK & Shenzhen, suggestions to make good use of the strengths of both places.  Especially, the well developed legal system in Hong Kong.  The benefits of both HK citizens and the Shenzhen side, develop win win solutions for this special administrative region in the Special administrative Regions.

5) Other opinions, including interests of different sectors.
Finance, High technology, tourisms, logistics, organic farming, reintroducing of varies industries; made various suggestions about use of the special location to provide more employment for Hong Kong people.

Your view
Please submit your written comments by 12 July 2008:
http://www.dudleysurveyors.com/LMC/

[ Last edited by wjemi at 6/07/2008 19:04 ]




Welcome to HKBWS Forum 香港觀鳥會討論區 (http://hkbws.org.hk/BBS/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0