HKBWS Forum 香港觀鳥會討論區 - Powered by Discuz! Board

Subject: Enquiry about Galuxe FN70ED Telescope多功能望遠鏡頭一問 [Print This Page]

Author: tonytony74 Time: 20/02/2009 22:37 Subject: Enquiry about Galuxe FN70ED Telescope多功能望遠鏡頭一問

大家有無用過Galuxe FN70ED Telescope多功能望遠鏡頭？
可否給些意見，因我開始喜影雀鳥，不知應買這個最遠有720mm的望遠鏡頭〈DC飛花賣梗$3580〉，抑或購買Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM呢〈有IS，更可配EF1.4X 或 EF2X增距鏡〉？
謝謝！
P.S.如果要配可順道觀鳥的觀鳥套件，要多付$1380
網址：http://www.galuxe.com.tw/telescope_FN70ED_426.html
http://www.dcfever.com/shop/product.php?topcat=&pid=2087

Hi,
i am a freshman of bird-watching, but i wanna ask which one listed below should i buy for convenient bird-photographing?
1. Galuxe FN70ED Telescope
2. Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM and EF1.4X 或 EF2X
Did any bird-watching fans use before? would you mind give me some advice for my best decision, thanks a lot!
related website:
http://www.galuxe.com.tw/telescope_FN70ED_426.html
http://www.dcfever.com/shop/product.php?topcat=&pid=2087

regards and cheers,
tony

Author: pitarhk Time: 21/02/2009 00:25

我建議買支100-400會好D(加個1.4x質數會差D),

呢種單筒見過用過,質數出黎唔夠靚(最主要散!)
而且佢落相機只有450mm f/6.4,手動對焦,影飛鳥會有難度

如果買單筒玩Digiscoping,多數都買S牌或L牌多,如果平玩N牌都可以!

Nikon Fieldscope ED82 20x-75x + Samsung NV10

Author: tonytony74 Time: 21/02/2009 22:51

謝謝師兄的意見，係咪始終鏡頭的色會好過Digiscoping的色，會無咁散？2.0x質素是否仲差過1.4x？是否建議索性不用？如果要Digiscoping，咁S牌或L牌有無好介紹呢？謝謝！

Author: pitarhk Time: 21/02/2009 23:14

Quote:

Original posted by tonytony74 at 21/02/2009 22:51
謝謝師兄的意見，係咪始終鏡頭的色會好過Digiscoping的色，會無咁散？2.0x質素是否仲差過1.4x？是否建議索性不用？如果要Digiscoping，咁S牌或L牌有無好介紹呢？謝謝！ ...

原廠鏡D色總好過digiscopingD色, (D色都係photoshop執出黎XD)
增距鏡感覺只係"放大左"!..鏡頭同增距都係有倍數計,倍數越大,質數越差(定焦鏡個倍數係0,所以質數最靚)
如果真係影靚相,有師兄就直情唔加,以距離換質數!

如果想玩Digiscoping,鏡唔好慳...最多人用係S牌(Swaroski)Swarovski ATS 80HD + 30x
呢支我無認真玩過,但好多師兄都係用呢枝玩digiscoping
http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/viewthread.php?tid=801

[ Last edited by pitarhk at 21/02/2009 23:16 ]

Author: tonytony74 Time: 22/02/2009 00:23

謝謝師兄的意見及條link,我都覺得原裝鏡的色應該會好的！
多口問句，請問你用梗邊枝鏡？抑或Digiscoping?
咁我又想問各位師兄師姐，買恆定遠攝及超遠攝鏡頭〈如：Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM〉好，抑或買遠攝變焦鏡頭〈如：Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM〉好？【同一焦距計算】
恆定好的，抑或買變焦會方便的？〈對我呢的初哥來講〉
謝謝！感激！
〈因為我想一開始就買支無選擇錯的，可以「行走江湖」嗎！〉

Author: Beetle Time: 22/02/2009 00:44

Quote:

Original posted by tonytony74 at 22/02/2009 00:23
謝謝師兄的意見及條link,我都覺得原裝鏡的色應該會好的！
多口問句，請問你用梗邊枝鏡？抑或Digiscoping?
咁我又想問各位師兄師姐，買恆定遠攝及超遠攝鏡頭〈如：Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM〉好，抑或買遠攝變焦鏡頭〈如：Canon EF ...

canon 支400/5.6好多人買左之後都冇後悔, 我見到有好多前輩買左大炮之後都仲有用。反而支100-400就有唔少人買完後發覺影出黎唔太sharp。如果你係有心影用黎影雀的話就買400/5.6,因為一定會sharp d又平d;但支鏡除左影雀之外唔係太方便,如果你想用黎影埋其他野就要三思。焦距不在話下,除左冇is之餘, 最近對焦距離要成3米幾(i.e. 放大率唔夠大,影蝴蝶蜻蜓等就麻煩)。所以買邊支真係要睇閣下選擇。

代pitarhk答埋,佢用緊nikon AF-S 300mm F/4. (同埋上面支nikon單筒ED82)

[ Last edited by Beetle at 22/02/2009 00:51 ]

Author: hkwongkit Time: 22/02/2009 10:05

Also see ...
http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/view ... &extra=page%3D1

Author: tonytony74 Time: 22/02/2009 21:10

thanks the opinion from members "Beetle" & "hkwongkit", very useful!
And, i am considering to buy 100-400 because i would also use it to take other creatures' photo, and i think digiscoping is quite complicated for me, right?
But, is it cheaper and practical to buy digiscope not only for bird watching but for digiscoping as well...

Author: bmw343hp Time: 2/03/2009 00:05

Hi
I'm using 100-400 now
much better then my old set up 70-200 + 1.4
would suggest join our outing and see other C hing set up
100-400 is good but never enough
also before ask for 100-400 the shop sales said this Galuxe set up is not as sharp as 100-400
hope to help

[ Last edited by bmw343hp at 2/03/2009 00:07 ]

Author: tonytony74 Time: 2/03/2009 21:18

thanks for information from "bmw343hp", I would like to join and share in using 100-400 if you organize a bird-watching and photo-taking trip (because i had already bought 100-400 last week)!

Author: bmw343hp Time: 27/03/2009 18:32

welcome to the group
this week is not a good weather to bird watching
hope could meet u soon

Welcome to HKBWS Forum 香港觀鳥會討論區 (http://hkbws.org.hk/BBS/)