It is very easy to say all birds are the result of releases for species such as this, and to leave that as the status for evermore. There is no question that Red-billed Leiothrix is common in the cage bird trade, and no doubt some escapes or deliberate releases occur (Hong Kong Island in August would seem to me to be a very likely release).
The point I was trying to make is that it may be worth keeping an open mind rather than just flippantly saying 'Bird Release' for all records. The RC regularly reassesses Cat III birds to assess whether wild birds may be occurring (Small Niltava, Mrs Gould's Sunbird and Hawfinch being recent examples of species which have changed status). I was trying to ask whether similar assessments are done for Cat II species. Most of these would be very difficult because they are currently so widespread (Rufous-capped Babbler, Greater Necklaced Laughingthrush etc.), but Red-billed Leiothrix is generally, in my opinion, a rather uncommon bird in HK with a fairly restricted distribution.
I am not saying these birds are wild or that the current status is necessarily incorrect. It may be that there are feral populations I am not aware of or that the population on TMS has had a very successful breeding season and spread to other sites. But if there has been a sudden, simultaneous increase in numbers at geographically-separated sites away from human activity, it seems unlikely to me that these are all the result of recent releases and that something else may be going on.
Any reassessment would, of course, require the consideration of appropriate information, for example the current status of feral populations, the current status in the cage bird trade, the current status over the border in China, any evidence for movements of the species and any pattern in records.