lterence

大家畀o的意見, 佢有無錯..

http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=368127&extra=page%3D1

我睇完佢o既答辯失望同憤慨!!!

lterence

雖然大家對用閃燈攝鳥未有 1 致結論, 不過咁近干擾野生鳥類o既巢同鼓勵他人作相同拍攝行為我極之關注.. 我會打去漁護處投訴..

Quote:

你意思係想知邊度影?

PM 你可以, 因為我相信你係愛鳥之人不會騷擾佢地, 但其實實際有也怕你找不到~ 但找到還要找條過高梯先影到

lterence

Quote:

your previous post has been captured for the photographer's record.  It is his discretion for any further action.

This is obviously not the point of discussions.

What we observe is that you are supporting the bahaviour, here.

http://www.nikonuser.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=49666&extra=page%3D1

http://www.nikonuser.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=49725&extra=page%3D1&page=1

Please make more sense with what you type, and more importantly, capture this post. Thanks.

lterence

[quote:26f4a69f4c="wstanley"][quote:26f4a69f4c="cfrankie"]個個以前都是影.友...有D各自有五六年交情..現在好似為一次小事...馬上要寫下休書錦.值得嗎?..如果你的親人做這些事...唔通又寫休書...次次都係對人唔對事...我決定香港生態綱絕筆...華人一些不好性格盡現
:shock:  :shock:[/quote]


cfrankie 所言，我猜非單單今次事件才作決定，唔好胡亂強姦人意見！[/quote]

請你 1. 入正題 2. 用字檢點 3. 勿浪費大家時間

Thanks.

lterence

[quote:9626c1f2fe="wstanley"]詞不達意，當然要攪清楚啦！至於(用字要檢點)你唔會係話我呀嘛？[/quote]

你不知所謂唔通又要人家給你 1 課?  :roll: