https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%e6%b8%af%e8%81%9e/article/20240224/s00002/1708714096255可參考今日(2月24日)明報A2版、見上URL。有關「認錯雀」疑雲、昨日大台新聞有报道、著重責任機構/組織確認第三張是鳳頭鷹、重點係: 雖認錯頭兩張雀、但不會影响環評的結論云云。
Nice to read HKBWS's updates and URLs on the subject amid the closing of the consultation very soon. As members of Society and the public may not be familiar with the grandiose blueprints, we look forward to more posts/analyses like this on the EIA and EcIA in due course, if not a Society Briefing to members on the stance.
话時話、第三張相太朦、單憑翼形尾形、不足以定案是否鳳頭鷹、感覺上是(縱使普通鵟幼鳥也可能)。但报告不寫是旅鴿、也不太差罷了。
BTW, the low resolution of Plate 3 impedes the identification. Crested goshawk likely though. At least it was not been asserted as a passenger pigeon. Not too bad!
