tonytony74

大家有無用過Galuxe FN70ED Telescope多功能望遠鏡頭？
可否給些意見，因我開始喜影雀鳥，不知應買這個最遠有720mm的望遠鏡頭〈DC飛花賣梗$3580〉，抑或購買Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM呢〈有IS，更可配EF1.4X 或 EF2X增距鏡〉？
謝謝！
P.S.如果要配可順道觀鳥的觀鳥套件，要多付$1380
網址：http://www.galuxe.com.tw/telescope_FN70ED_426.html
http://www.dcfever.com/shop/product.php?topcat=&pid=2087


Hi,
i am a freshman of bird-watching, but i wanna ask which one listed below should i buy for convenient bird-photographing?
1. Galuxe FN70ED Telescope
2. Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM and EF1.4X 或 EF2X
Did any bird-watching fans use before? would you mind give me some advice for my best decision, thanks a lot!
related website:
http://www.galuxe.com.tw/telescope_FN70ED_426.html
http://www.dcfever.com/shop/product.php?topcat=&pid=2087

regards and cheers,
tony

pitarhk

我建議買支100-400會好D(加個1.4x質數會差D),

呢種單筒見過用過,質數出黎唔夠靚(最主要散!)
而且佢落相機只有450mm f/6.4,手動對焦,影飛鳥會有難度


如果買單筒玩Digiscoping,多數都買S牌或L牌多,如果平玩N牌都可以!

Nikon Fieldscope ED82 20x-75x + Samsung NV10

tonytony74

謝謝師兄的意見，係咪始終鏡頭的色會好過Digiscoping的色，會無咁散？2.0x質素是否仲差過1.4x？是否建議索性不用？如果要Digiscoping，咁S牌或L牌有無好介紹呢？謝謝！

pitarhk

Quote:

Original posted by tonytony74 at 21/02/2009 22:51
謝謝師兄的意見，係咪始終鏡頭的色會好過Digiscoping的色，會無咁散？2.0x質素是否仲差過1.4x？是否建議索性不用？如果要Digiscoping，咁S牌或L牌有無好介紹呢？謝謝！ ...

原廠鏡D色總好過digiscopingD色, (D色都係photoshop執出黎XD)
增距鏡感覺只係"放大左"!..鏡頭同增距都係有倍數計,倍數越大,質數越差(定焦鏡個倍數係0,所以質數最靚)
如果真係影靚相,有師兄就直情唔加,以距離換質數!

如果想玩Digiscoping,鏡唔好慳...最多人用係S牌(Swaroski)Swarovski ATS 80HD + 30x
呢支我無認真玩過,但好多師兄都係用呢枝玩digiscoping
http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/viewthread.php?tid=801

[ Last edited by pitarhk at 21/02/2009 23:16 ]

tonytony74

謝謝師兄的意見及條link,我都覺得原裝鏡的色應該會好的！
多口問句，請問你用梗邊枝鏡？抑或Digiscoping?
咁我又想問各位師兄師姐，買恆定遠攝及超遠攝鏡頭〈如：Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM〉好，抑或買遠攝變焦鏡頭〈如：Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM〉好？【同一焦距計算】
恆定好的，抑或買變焦會方便的？〈對我呢的初哥來講〉
謝謝！感激！
〈因為我想一開始就買支無選擇錯的，可以「行走江湖」嗎！〉

Beetle

Quote:

Original posted by tonytony74 at 22/02/2009 00:23
謝謝師兄的意見及條link,我都覺得原裝鏡的色應該會好的！
多口問句，請問你用梗邊枝鏡？抑或Digiscoping?
咁我又想問各位師兄師姐，買恆定遠攝及超遠攝鏡頭〈如：Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM〉好，抑或買遠攝變焦鏡頭〈如：Canon EF ...

canon 支400/5.6好多人買左之後都冇後悔, 我見到有好多前輩買左大炮之後都仲有用。反而支100-400就有唔少人買完後發覺影出黎唔太sharp。如果你係有心影用黎影雀的話就買400/5.6,因為一定會sharp d又平d;但支鏡除左影雀之外唔係太方便,如果你想用黎影埋其他野就要三思。焦距不在話下,除左冇is之餘, 最近對焦距離要成3米幾(i.e. 放大率唔夠大,影蝴蝶蜻蜓等就麻煩)。所以買邊支真係要睇閣下選擇。

代pitarhk答埋,佢用緊nikon AF-S 300mm F/4. (同埋上面支nikon單筒ED82)

[ Last edited by Beetle at 22/02/2009 00:51 ]

hkwongkit

Also see ...
http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/view ... &extra=page%3D1

tonytony74

thanks the opinion from members "Beetle" & "hkwongkit", very useful!
And, i am considering to buy 100-400 because i would also use it to take other creatures' photo, and i think digiscoping is quite complicated for me, right?
But, is it cheaper and practical to buy digiscope not only for bird watching but for digiscoping as well...

bmw343hp

Hi
I'm using 100-400 now
much better then my old set up 70-200 + 1.4
would suggest join our outing and see other C hing set up
100-400 is good but never enough
also before ask for 100-400 the shop sales said this Galuxe set up is not as sharp as 100-400  
hope to help

[ Last edited by bmw343hp at 2/03/2009 00:07 ]

tonytony74

thanks for information from "bmw343hp", I would like to join and share in using 100-400 if you organize a bird-watching and photo-taking trip (because i had already bought 100-400 last week)!

bmw343hp

welcome to the group
this week is not a good weather to bird watching
hope could meet u soon