I am very new to bird watching. Maybe I am really do not have the position or unwise to say anything here. But as a christian, I would like to be the messager for peace. Forgive me for my poor English. But I think it is better to write it in both languages for those who do not know Chinese to read and share their views too.
我剛開始觀鳥不久, 也許並沒有資格甚至是不智在這裡說三道四, 但作為基督徒, 我希望能才為和平之使。對不起,我的英文並不是很好, 但仍然堅持以雙語回聲, 希望那些不懂中文的讀者也能明白、回應。
Firstly, I thank VRII for bringing out many issues in your posts here and elsewhere. I think these really make many of us to think clearly what is true and what is guess. Like the one in "bird of paradise story".
http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/view ... &extra=page%3D1 (For those who read English only, this post talk about someone thought that bird were manipulated for photography, but the originally photographer clearly stated that he used 3 years to find the location and in the third year used 3 months to watch and take the photos.
http://www.pixoto.com/images-pho ... dise-story-92996560,
http://www.pixoto.com/images-pho ... f-paradise-71513063)
首先, 很感謝VRII君在這裡及其他地方發表的Post. 很多都發人心省, 如"最近興用萬能膠攻擊別人"(
http://www.hkbws.org.hk/BBS/view ... &extra=page%3D1)中的資料, 很好的反映什麼是事實, 什麼是猜測。
I think it really reflect the culture of internet nowadays. If you have watch some news program in TV, it talked about the judgement of people in Mainland China and HK on various incidents. People response on other's critics and exaggerate it without proof. They think that they have the freedom of speech and can say anything in the internet. But by doing so, they became the judge but without double-checking the evidence. I think this program is very good in its view and it also interviewed those who are being criticized. I think this culture was developed by some aggressive new newspaper and magazines which, when launched many years ago, used exaggerate method to catch eyeballs and burst sales. I think this culture should not be encouraged. We, when criticized on something, should give more evidence and for those who want to response should clarify whether there are enough proof.
我想這反映了現在的網絡文化。如你最近有觀看電視上的新聞節目(忘記是那一個)講述在國內或香港的事件時, 有些人在網上發表評擊, 其他人在未了解事件的始末便加入回應評擊, 他們認為自己有言論自由, 可以在網上發表自己的看法。但這樣做, 他們便變為法官但却沒有法律上嚴謹的辯證。我認為這個新聞節目十分好, 而節目亦有訪問那些受評擊的人。我想這種文化是過往一些新的報紙及雜誌在推出時以誇張手法吸引讀者及推高銷量。 我想這種文化不應被鼓勵, 我們在提出評擊前, 應將足夠的事實根據提出, 而在回應前亦應想清楚那些批評是否有足夠的事實根據, 這樣自然的謠言止於智者。
Writing this response in English and Chinese are exhausting. And I have work to do now, so excuse me I will continue to express my view in the coming post. Thanks
用雙語來寫這篇回應很費力, 而我亦有事忙, 所以請容我將其他回應留在未來的post, 謝謝
(To be contined)
