HKBWS BBS » ´ä Æ[ ³¾ ·| ·s »D ²Õ


    
      
        HKBWS BBS » ´ä Æ[ ³¾ ·| ·s »D ²Õ
        (http://www.hkbws.org.hk/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl)
      

        Discussion Area °Q½×°Ï >> Conservation ¦ÛµM«O¨| >>  ¬F©²°]¬F¹wºâ¡G«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨
        
(Message started by: Webcreeper on Mar 11^th, 2004, 6:51am)

Title: ¬F©²°]¬F¹wºâ¡G«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨
Post by Webcreeper on Mar 11^th, 2004, 6:51am

¤µ¤é©ú³ø¡G

«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨ ³¥³¾¿ßª¯¤]¾D¬o
3¤ë 11¤é ¬P´Á¥| 02:35 §ó·s

¡i©ú³ø±M°T¡j¬F©²°]¨ª¡A³s¦Ì®H³¶³¾¡B¿ò±ó¿ßª¯¥ç¦¨¶}¤M¹ï¶H¡C·RÅ@°Êª«¨ó·|¤Î¦Ì®HÀã¦a¤µ¦~¥iÀòªº¸ê§U¼·´Ú¡A±N¤j´î¨â¦Ü¤T¦¨¡C¨ü§U¾÷ºcºÙªA°È¨ü¼vÅT¡Ap¹º¤¤ªº¦Ì®Hºû×¤uµ{¥çn©µ¿ð¡C¦¹¥~¡Aº®Å@¸p04/05¦~ªº¦ÛµMÅ@²z¶}¤ä±N¤j´î8800¦h¸U¤¸¡A¥]¬A04/05¦~«×®âºØ¾ð]¼Æ¥Ø¥Ñ88¸U´î¦Ü78¸U®è¡C

·RÅ@°Êª«¨ó·|ÅFµuµø

º®Å@¸p°]¬F¹wºâ¸ê®ÆÅã¥Ü¡A·RÅ@°Êª«¨ó·|ªº¼·´Ú¥Ñ03/04¦~«×ªº118.8¸U¤¸´î¦Ü04/05¦~«×90.8¸U¡A´î´T23.6¢H¡CÅ@²z¤ÎºÞ²z©Ô©iÂÄº¸¤½¬ùÀã¦aªº¸ê§Uª÷¡A¨ü§U¾÷ºc¥]¬A¦Ì®H¦ÛµM«OÅ@°Ï¡Bªø¬KªÀ¤Î»´äÆ[³¾·|¡A¼·´Ú§ó¥Ñ308¸U¤¸´î¦Ü208¸U¤¸ ¡A¤j«d¦Ê¸U¡A´î´T¹F32¢H¡C

·RÅ@°Êª«¨ó·|¦æ¬FÁ`ºÊPauline Taylor¹ï©ó¬F©²¤j´î¶}¤ä·P¨ì¥¢±æ¡C¦o»¡¬F©²¹L¥h5¦~³v¨B´î¤Ö¸ê§U¼·´Ú¡A¥LÌ¤w³z¹L«d´î¤H¤âÀ³¥I¡A¦ý³o¦¸´î´T¹F¨â¦¨¦h¡A·|ÄY«¼vÅT¹B§@¡C¦o§åµû¬F©²µuµø¡Aºzµø±±¨î°Êª«Ác´Þ¤u§@¡C¦Ì®H¦ÛµM«OÅ@°Ï¸g²z·¨¸ô¦~¥çºÙ¡Aì¥ýp¹º¦b¦Ì®H°µ¬ü¤Æ¤u§@¡A§l¤ÞÀã¦a³¥¥Í°Êª«¡A¨Ã¼W¥[¤½²³Æ[½à³]¬I¡A¦ý¨ü¼·´Ú¼vÅTn©µ¿ðp¹º¡C¦Ì®H·|Äw´Ú¡A§Æ±æ¥iÄ~Äòp¹º¡C¥LºÙ°]¨ª«ùÄò¡A¾á¤ß¨C¦~¼·´Ú´î¤Ö¡C

¤ÖºØ10¸U¾ð ¤Ö®·¬y®ö°Êª«

º®Å@¸p¥ç±¹ï«d´î¶}¤äÀ£¤O¡AÁöµM¸Ó¸p¹wp¤µ¦~¨ì¥³¥¤½¶éªº¹C«È·|¼W¥[2.5¢H¡A¥Ñ1220¸U¤H¼W¦Ü1250¸U¤H¡A¦ý±Ð¨|¬¡°Ê¤Ï¦Ó´î¤Ö¡A¹wp°Ñ¥[¤H¼Æ¥Ñ25¸U´î¦Ü20¸U¡C¸Ó¸p04/05¦~«×¥ç·|´î¤ÖºØ¾ð]10¸U´Ê¡C°Êª«ºÊºÞ¤è±¡A¹wp¤µ¦~®·Àòªº¬y®ö°Êª«´î¤Ö18¢H¡A¥Ñ2.2¸U°¦´î¦Ü1.8¸U°¦¡Q±µ¨ü¨¾¬Ìª`®g°Êª«¤]´îªñ¨â¦¨¡A¥Ñ4.5¸U°¦´î¦Ü3.7¸U°¦¡CÀô¹Ò¿Ô¸ß©eû·|¦¨ûÝªø¬KªÀ²z¨Æ§d¯ª«n»¡¡A«OÅ@Àô¹Ò¡u¹w¨¾³Ó©óªvÀø¡v¡CY¤£°µ¦nÀô«O±Ð¨|¤u§@¡A¤é«á¯}ÃaÀô¹Òn¸É±Ïªº¦¨¥»§ó¤j¡A¬F©²¤£¯à¦]¤p¥¢¤j¡C¥L©ú¥Õ²{®É°]¨ª¤Un«d´î¤ä¥X¡A¦ý§Æ±æ¤é«á¸gÀÙ¦nÂà¡A¬F©²¯à¬ÛÀ³½Õ¾ã¼·´Ú¡C

©ú³ø°OªÌ ³¯°·¨Î

¼Ë¼Ë³£´î¡A«oªá2600¸U¬°¤Ö©ó¤Q¦W§ø¥Á««Ø²`¯F½XÀY¡A«Â¯Ù¶g³òÀô¹Ò¡A¦ó¤£±N¿ú¼·µ¹º®Å@¸p©Î¨ä¥L«O¨|¶µ¥Ø¡AÅý§ó¦h¤H¨ü´f¡H ???

Title: Re: ¬F©²°]¬F¹wºâ¡G«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨
Post by Owen on Mar 11^th, 2004, 10:49am

Ú»¨ìÓ¸£ºu§r~~!! ±Ï©R~~!!

Title: Re: ¬F©²°]¬F¹wºâ¡G«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨
Post by isaac_chan on Mar 11^th, 2004, 1:00pm

"¦Ì®HÀã¦a¤µ¦~¥iÀòªº¸ê§U¼·´Ú¡A±N¤j´î¨â¦Ü¤T¦¨."

©Ò¥Hn§â¸V¬y·Pªº·½ÀY±Àµ¹Ô³¾? ??? :P
>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

:'(

Title: Re: ¬F©²°]¬F¹wºâ¡G«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨
Post by Stanley on Mar 16^th, 2004, 2:24am

Å¥»Dº®Å@¸p¹ï¨ú®ø¹ï³¾·|ªº¸ê§U, ¥i¯à·|§ï°µ¨ä¥L¼Ò¦¡, ¬O§_¯uªº¶Ü¡H

§Úªº¤ßµh¤F......
½ÐºûÅ@§ÚÌ¤Ü¦h¦~¨Ó«Ø¥ßªº¶Ç²Î¡B¥H¤Î¦U¤H¬°¦ÛµM«O¨|©Ò¥I¥Xªº§V¤O !

Title: Re: ¬F©²°]¬F¹wºâ¡G«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨
Post by BERNARD on Mar 16^th, 2004, 7:10pm

Hi Webcreeper,

Now I understand why the government wants to spend 26 million dollars to rebuild the Sham Chung Ferry Pier (even though there are only a few villagers living around this area) but cut spending on nature conservation by 20-30 percent. Today (16March) I read an article from "The Standard" media website. The title is "Flatsplan for Green Sites". In paragraph 7 it mentioned that a part of land near Sham Chung wetlands was already sold to a well known property development company several years ago.

Now this luxurious ferry pier is just paving the way for future large scale real estate construction ! It is that simple ! Don't you understand ??

If you want to read the whole article please type www.thestandard.com.hk and look for "Flatsplan for Green Sites" on today's (16March) local news.

The government has an ideal "dream" of selling lands of high conservation value to commercial property developers while enforcing the so called conservation rules to restrict their scale of construction . It argues that it can raise further money for conservation.

Will this dream come true ? Let's see how Fung Lok Fai goes.

Bernard

Title: Re: ¬F©²°]¬F¹wºâ¡G«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨
Post by Webcreeper on Mar 16^th, 2004, 8:33pm

Thanks Bernard for the link!

"One of the sites is the Sham Chung wetland, bordering the Sai Kung West Country Park, near Yung Shue O, which is understood to have been bought by Sun Hung Kai Properties several years ago. A spokesman for the company refused to comment yesterday on claims that it now wants to develop the land."

'"The developers must first enhance the ecological value of the lands before launching other projects,'' she said. ``Developers need to pay the price. All of them have to bear social responsibilities.'''

I don't know what SHK had done to enhance the ecology of Sham Chung. All I know is that the freshwater marsh there was converted into a golf course by a developer, who subsequently abandoned it.  It seems the original natural environment has been lost forever, for nothing.

'He (villager Mr Cheung of Sha Lo Tung) said the government should let private developers manage and develop such land while caring for the ecology, adding: ``We need someone to manage the land in order to protect it.'''

I don't notice any sign of ecological management at Sham Chung, although it has been developed.

Is the new 26-million-dollar pier meant to encourage more development,  which will bring more damage?

Why couldn't the developer fund it himself, to pay the price as Dr Liao said?

Title: Re: ¬F©²°]¬F¹wºâ¡G«O¨|¸ê§U«d¤T¦¨
Post by Dragontail on Mar 16^th, 2004, 10:26pm

what SHK did in the marsh of Sham Chung at 1998, pls visit:
http://www.hku.hk/ecology/porcupine/por19/features.htm

which make a special freshwater fish extinct in HK, this is what the land developer do for our ecoloy. :-[

"Of course, until a development application at Sham Chung is submitted to the Government by Sun Hung Kai, this remains only a conspiracy theory."

Billy Hau was right - the development application is coming.  What is the purpose of a luxury pier?

Now I learn that the Tung Chung River is not the first case of stream destruction. Before that the globally-rare Black Paradise Fish had already lost their home at Sham Chung. :'(

We may stop any further damage in Sham Chung,

pls visit the site, sign the online objection letter

http://redbuilding.com/ska/sham_chung/sham_chung.html

and tell you friend also.

Yes, I have done it!

Anyone who thinks the pier is too much should sign it. If we cannot stop them this time, at least we can make them think twice before committing to similar ridiculous projects in future.