|
||
Title: ±µ»é±æ»·Ãè¨ì Canon SLR Post by jarvis on Apr 17th, 2003, 12:14pm ¤p§Ì²{¦³ EOS 10D ¤@³¡, ·Q¸Õ¤U¥´³¶, ¦ý300mm¥H¤WªºÃèÀY¬Ò¬° L Ãè, »ù¿úµ´¹ï¥I¾á¤£°_ §Ú¨£¨ì³¡¤À¥xÆWªº¼v¤Í±N Swarovski, Zeiss, Leica µ¥±æ»·Ãè»é¸¨ DC ³£¦³ø¿ùo¬J®ÄªG, ·Q¸Õ¤@¸Õ Zeiss 85mm T + Nikon Coolpix 995 http://www.dcview.com.tw/gallery/showmsg.asp?msgid=130355&place=15&posit=12 Swarovski HD-ATS80 + Nikon Coolpix 995 http://www.dcview.com.tw/gallery/showmsg.asp?msgid=130297&place=15&posit=20 Leica APO Televid 77 + Nikon Coolpix 995 http://www.dcview.com.tw/gallery/showmsg.asp?msgid=130177&place=15&posit=39 ½Ð°Ý¥«±¤W¦³µL adaptor ¥i¥H±N©O´X¤äÃè»é¸¨ EOS ¾÷¨? ¥H¼v¬Û¾¤Á¿ÃäÓµP¤l½è¯À¸û°ª? CP ȸû°ª? ¦³«§«¬¸¹¥i±À¤¶ (budget ¤@¸U¤º) ? ©O D ±æ»·Ãè¹ïµJ³t«×¤ñ°_¦³ USM o¬J Canon Ãè®t´X»·? (·|ø·|ºC¨ì¦n¦ü¤@¯ë DC ËݺC?) ¨£¨ì¥Ã¦¨¥u©ñ¥ª¤@¤ä Zeiss ¦P¤@¤ä Leica¥X¾¤, ½Ð°Ý¦³µL¨ä¥LçE¦³¦h d ¿ï¾Ü? ¤@¦¸¹L°ÝËݦho³¥, ø¦n·N«ä ^_^ Leica «¬¸¹: http://www.binoculars.com/series.asp?SID=424 Zeiss «¬¸¹: http://www.binoculars.com/brand.asp?BID=79 Swarovski: http://www.binoculars.com/brand.asp?BID=71 |
||
Title: Re: ±µ»é±æ»·Ãè¨ì Canon SLR Post by 648 on Apr 19th, 2003, 9:45pm jarvis¥S¡G ¥i¥H¥Îsigma 50-500mmÃèÀY©ÎCANON 400MM F5.6. ¥Hleica apo 77¬°¨Ò,leicaì¼t¦³photo adaptor,¥un´«¥h¥ØÃè¦A¥[¤W¤@ÓEOS T-RING´N¥i¥H±µ¨ì10D¤W,¦¨¬°800mm F10.6ªºÃèÀY,®ÄªG¤£¤ñAPO77+20X¥ØÃè+995¦n;±µ¦ýµL½×¬O±µ995©Î¬O10D³£¬O¤â°Ê¹ïµJ.©Ò¥H¹ïµJ³t«×¨Sªk¤ñ¸û. Åwªï¤@°_¬ã¨s ªü¸=648 |
||
Title: Re: ±µ»é±æ»·Ãè¨ì Canon SLR Post by jarvis on Apr 19th, 2003, 11:14pm ¦hÁ¸ôªº«ü¤Þ! ®¤¤p§Ì·M¬N, ì¨Ó³o¨Ç±æ»·Ãè¥u±o¤â°Ê¹ïµJ, ¨º§Ú¦³¤£·|¦Ò¼{¤F ±z´£Ä³ªº EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ¬Ý¨Ó»ù¿ú¤]¤£¥©y, ½Ð°Ý¤j·§¬O¦h¤Ö (¬Û«H¤]ªñ¸U)? ¥t¥~ Sigma ¨º¤ä¤S¬O¦h¤Ö? ÁÂÁÂ! |
||
Title: Re: ±µ»é±æ»·Ãè¨ì Canon SLR Post by Daniel CK Chan on Apr 22nd, 2003, 2:07pm on 04/19/03 at 23:14:29, jarvis wrote:
I had quoted 400/5.6 in Salon half year ago which costs around HKD7,500. I would suggest you go with this option for bird photography mainly (only). However, please check whether there is stock in Salon or Man Shing etc. as this lens is no longer to be produced. You can also think about 100-400 IS (around 11,000) or 300/4 IS (around 9,000) instead. The differences between these lens are shown for your reference. 1. 400/5.6, IS= No, MFN = 4m, Remarks = Optically best among the 3 2. 1--400 IS, IS=Yes, MFN=1.8m, Remarks = Very versatile lens but optically worse in 400mm among the three, IMO 3. 300 IS, IS=Yes, MFN=1.5m, Remarks=Optically good even with 1.4X attached (You can ask 648 for his experience as he have this lens). Note: IS = Image stabilizer, good for in-still shot and hand-held for in-flight shot MFN = minimum focusing distance, low number means that it is good for macro or closeup shot , but slower for inflight shot (hunting back & forth to search for the object). You can also check the following link for reference. http://www.birdsasart.com/faq.html |
||
Title: Re: ±µ»é±æ»·Ãè¨ì Canon SLR Post by KK Hui on Apr 22nd, 2003, 5:31pm on 04/22/03 at 14:07:07, Daniel CK Chan wrote:
Daniel, the EF400/5.6L is still in production according to Canon as far as I know. I own this lens and would highly recommend it for bird photography particularly for handheld flight shots. It sould work well with EOS-10D with a FOV crop factor of 1.6x ... Best kk ---------- www.geocities.com/kkhui_001 |
||
Title: Re: ±µ»é±æ»·Ãè¨ì Canon SLR Post by jarvis on Apr 22nd, 2003, 11:46pm ¤p§Ì¼vÄÖ¥u¦³¤@¦~¦h, è±q prosumer DC ¤É¯Å¦Ü DSLR ¹ïÃèÀYªº»{ÃѤ£¦h, ¼È®É¥u¦³¤@¤ä 28-135 IS ©¯¦n±o¨ì¤T¦ì®v¥Sªº¸Ô²Ó¸Ñµª ÁÂÁÂ! |
||
Title: Re: ±µ»é±æ»·Ãè¨ì Canon SLR Post by W S Leung on Apr 29th, 2003, 1:32pm ½Ð®¤¥»¤H·M¬N§Ú¬O¨Ï¥Î Canon EF200 ¦ý¬Û«H©çÄᳶ³¾¨Ã¤£¨¬°÷¡C³Ìªñ¬ÝÂø»x¤~ª¾¹D±æ»·Ãè¥i¥H±µ»é¨ì Canon SLR ¥i¬OÓý¤£¤Ó©ú¥Õ¡A²{¦³¦¹°ÝÃD½Ð¤j®a«ü±Ð«ü±Ð: ¬Û¾÷±µ»é±æ»·Ãè»Ýn¬Æ»ò°t¥ó? ¥ØÃè¬O¬Æ»ò? ¥¦©M±æ»·Ãè¤Î¬Û¾÷ªºÃö«Y«ç¼Ë? ±æ»·Ã誺¿¼Æ¦h¤Ö¤~³Ì¾A¦X(¸gÀÙ¯à¤O¦³)? ¨º¦¹«~µP¤ñ¸û¸gÀÙ¹ê´f? ¨º¦¹©±çE¥i¥H§ä¨ì±æ»·Ãè? |
||
HKBWS BBS » ´ä Æ[ ³¾ ·| ·s »D ²Õ » Powered by YaBB! YaBB 2000-2002, Xnull. All Rights Reserved. |