HKBWS BBS ­» ´ä Æ[ ³¾ ·| ·s »D ²Õ (http://www.hkbws.org.hk/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl)
Discussion Area °Q½×°Ï >> Photo Gallery ¬Û¤ù¤À¨É II >> Buffy Fish-Owl °¨¨Óº®ì¦ <Malaysia °¨¨Ó¦è¨È>
(Message started by: pippenho on May 26th, 2006, 1:45pm)

Title: Buffy Fish-Owl °¨¨Óº®ì¦ <Malaysia °¨¨Ó¦è¨È>
Post by pippenho on May 26th, 2006, 1:45pm
Sandakan, Malaysia ¤s¥´®Ú, °¨¨Ó¦è¨È &nbsp;
Date/Time: 2006:05:15 21:32:24
Camera model: Canon EOS-1D Mark II &nbsp;
Flash : -1.66ev
Focal length: 500.0mm
Exposure time: 1/200s
Aperture: f/5.6
ISO equiv.: 400
Monopod on boat
http://images4.fotop.net/albums2/pippenho/Birds_of_Borneo/Buffy_Fish_Owl_GF2V0034b.jpg
http://images4.fotop.net/albums2/pippenho/Birds_of_Borneo/Buffy_Fish_Owl_GF2V0061d.jpg


Title: Re: Buffy Fish-Owl °¨¨Óº®ì¦ (Malaysia)
Post by Etta on May 26th, 2006, 2:10pm

on 05/23/06 at 07:25:15, felixcat wrote:
15/05/2006
Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia

http://images4.fotop.net/albums4/felixcat/Sandakan/MJ9G4991.jpg
1DMKII, 300/4+1.4X, ISO100, F5.6@1/250s, Flash -1.66ev


You and Felix both used Flash but why there's such big different on the colour of the bird in the photos especially the eyes?  http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_11_23.gif

Is it a matter of distance and angle?  ???

Title: Re: Buffy Fish-Owl °¨¨Óº®ì¦ (Malaysia)
Post by pippenho on May 26th, 2006, 2:47pm

on 05/26/06 at 14:10:35, Etta wrote:
You and Felix both used Flash but why there's such big different on the colour of the bird in the photos especially the eyes?

Is it a matter of distance and angle? &nbsp;???


¬õ²´ªº¦¨¦]¬O¦]¬°Àû¤Õ¥¼¾AÀ³¥ú½u¦Ó¦¨,
µ¥²î®aªº¤j¥ú¿O·Ó©w«á,¦A¥Î¤ñ¸û®zªº°{¥ú©çÄá,´N¤£·|¥X²{¬õ²´¤F!
²î®a¤]¤£·|ªø®É¶¡·Ó©wº®ì¦,¤j·§10-20¬í´N·|²¾¶}¿O¥ú,
ªG«×Dº®ì¦¤]¦n¹³²ßºD¤F(¥i¯à¬O¦]¬°¦³¦n¨Ç±ß¤Wªº¥ÍºA¹Î),
Felix¼vªºªG°¦´N¬O¶V­¸¶Vªñ,³Ì«á¸¨ÅT§Ú¦a­±«e­Ë¦bªe­±ªº¾ð¤W,
ªñ¨ì§Ú¥Î500mm¤£¯à¹ïµJ :-[,³Ì«á§Ú¦a¨«Ê\³£¥ò¥øÅT¨ì!


Title: Re: Buffy Fish-Owl °¨¨Óº®ì¦ (Malaysia)
Post by felixcat on May 27th, 2006, 12:23am

on 05/26/06 at 14:47:01, pippenho wrote:
¬õ²´ªº¦¨¦]¬O¦]¬°Àû¤Õ¥¼¾AÀ³¥ú½u¦Ó¦¨,
µ¥²î®aªº¤j¥ú¿O·Ó©w«á,¦A¥Î¤ñ¸û®zªº°{¥ú©çÄá,´N¤£·|¥X²{¬õ²´¤F!
²î®a¤]¤£·|ªø®É¶¡·Ó©wº®ì¦,¤j·§10-20¬í´N·|²¾¶}¿O¥ú,
ªG«×Dº®ì¦¤]¦n¹³²ßºD¤F(¥i¯à¬O¦]¬°¦³¦n¨Ç±ß¤Wªº¥ÍºA¹Î),
Felix¼vªºªG°¦´N¬O¶V­¸¶Vªñ,³Ì«á¸¨ÅT§Ú¦a­±«e­Ë¦bªe­±ªº¾ð¤W,
ªñ¨ì§Ú¥Î500mm¤£¯à¹ïµJ :-[,³Ì«á§Ú¦a¨«Ê\³£¥ò¥øÅT¨ì!


I remember they were different fish-owl captured at different distances and thus could not be compared.  The real interesting is this owl...
http://images4.fotop.net/albums4/felixcat/Sandakan/MJ9G5426.jpg
Canon EOS-1D Mark II, 300/4+1.4, f/8.0, 1/250s, iso200, Flash-1ev

Title: Re: Buffy Fish-Owl °¨¨Óº®ì¦ <Malaysia °¨¨Ó¦è¨È>
Post by Etta on May 27th, 2006, 2:37pm
Thank you for all the explanations...  ;D

­ì¨Ó·í¦a©]¹C¥ÍºA¹Î³o»ò¿³©ô ¯u¬O¿O¤õ³qÀé ©]©ú¦p±Þ§r¡I 8)



HKBWS BBS ­» ´ä Æ[ ³¾ ·| ·s »D ²Õ » Powered by YaBB!
YaBB 2000-2002,
Xnull. All Rights Reserved.